-
68344, issued December 15, 2022.pdf
Krafthefer:
This determination is issued pursuant to section 3 .5( e) of the Open Meetings Act
(OMA) (5 ILCS 120/3.5(e) (West 2020))....
-
68340, issued February 14, 2022.pdf
See 15 ILCS 205/7(c)(3) (West 2020).
Accordingly, this office is not authorized to review alleged violations of the Board' s rules
governing members' conduct....
-
68219, issued July 13, 2022.pdf
In his Request for Review, alleged that the City Council
violated OMA by entering closed session to discuss the City Clerk pursuant to the exception–– to
the general requirement that public bodies openly discuss public business–– in section 2(c)(3) of
OMA...
-
68219, issued July 13, 2022.pdf
In his Request for Review, alleged that the City Council
violated OMA by entering closed session to discuss the City Clerk pursuant to the exception–– to
the general requirement that public bodies openly discuss public business–– in section 2(c)(3) of
OMA...
-
68199, issued April 8, 2022.pdf
request for a copy of the Board' s rules regarding public
comment, the Board provided copies of two versions of Board Policy 2:230: the one in effect at
the time of Request for Review, which was last revised on December 16,
2019, and the one enacted on May 3,...
-
67369, issued October 7, 2021.pdf
Pender:
This determination is issued pursuant to section 3. 5( e) of the Open Meetings Act
OMA) ( 5 ILCS 120/ 3. 5( e) ( West 2020))....
-
67024, issued March 10, 2021.pdf
Chavis:
Pursuant to section 3.S(a) of the Open Meetings Act (OMA) (5 ILCS 120/3.S(a)
(West 2018)), the Public Access Bureau has received your Request for Review alleging a
possible violation of OMA in connection with the December 17, 2020, meeting of the...
-
67024, issued March 10, 2021.pdf
Chavis:
Pursuant to section 3.S(a) of the Open Meetings Act (OMA) (5 ILCS 120/3.S(a)
(West 2018)), the Public Access Bureau has received your Request for Review alleging a
possible violation of OMA in connection with the December 17, 2020, meeting of the...
-
66989, issued February 23, 2021.pdf
Section 3. 5( a) of OMA ( 5 1LCS 120/ 3. 5( a) ( West 2018)) requires a Request for
Review to include " a summary of the facts supporting the allegation[ ]" that the public body
violated OMA....
-
66444, issued November 4, 2021.pdf
Milluzzi
November 4, 2021
Page 3
Members of the public may comment on agenda and non-
agenda items via email. Public comment will be accessible by
email in advance to boardcomments@hf223. org. Public comments
must be received by 4:00 p.m....
-
66200, issued February 22, 2022.pdf
due to the ethical recusal of the
Village Attorney on a matter." 2 Trustee Pierce stated that the inclusion of this agenda item arose
as a result of a complaint filed by a citizen against three trustees, including him, for alleged
violation of the Code. 3...
-
65997 66324, issued February 9, 2024.pdf
Wu:
This determination is issued pursuant to section 3 .5( e) of the Open Meetings Act
(OMA) (5 ILCS 120/3.5(e) (West 2022))....
-
65871 65961 66133, issued March 16, 2021.pdf
Wesner:
This determination letter is issued pursuant to section 3. 5( e) of the Open Meetings
Act ( OMA) ( 5 ILCS 120/ 3. 5( e) ( West 2018)....
-
65448, issued January 26, 2021.pdf
Lindemann:
This determination is issued pursuant to section 3.5(e) of the Open Meetings Act
(OMA) 5 ILCS 120/3.S(e) (West 2018))....
-
65418, issued November 17, 2021.pdf
Mark Stein
The Honorable Jenny Zinser
November 17, 2021
Page 2
meeting; (3) the Board took improper final action on an agenda item by making a decision in
closed session on " how to move forward in light of the recommendations made by the
Superintendent and...
-
65272, issued April 29, 2022.pdf
" 2 He argued that there was no pending litigation
and that the City Council's discussion of the mayor's salary was improper because the mayor is
an elected officer rather than an employee " and the Liquor Commissioner position is also held by
the Mayor."3...
-
65272, issued April 29, 2022.pdf
" 2 He argued that there was no pending litigation
and that the City Council's discussion of the mayor's salary was improper because the mayor is
an elected officer rather than an employee " and the Liquor Commissioner position is also held by
the Mayor."3...
-
65272, issued April 29, 2022.pdf
" 2 He argued that there was no pending litigation
and that the City Council's discussion of the mayor's salary was improper because the mayor is
an elected officer rather than an employee " and the Liquor Commissioner position is also held by
the Mayor."3...
-
65194, issued January 8, 2021.pdf
Bohman:
This determination is issued pursuant to section 3. 5( e) of the Open Meetings Act
OMA) ( 5 ILCS 120/ 3. 5( e) ( West 2018))....
-
65149, issued April 4, 2025.pdf
Evan Walter, the Village' s Assistant Administrator and Deputy Clerk, as well as
a variety of e-mail correspondence.3 Subsequently, the Public Access Bureau forwarded the
Board' s written response to He did not reply....